Richard Rohr – Letting Go: A Spirituality of Subtraction – 5 – Security vs Solidarity

You cannot serve security and solidarity.

Comment – After 9/11 security has become a universally sought after value in the West in general and the US in particular. Yet, security, as legitimate as it may be as a basic human need, remains strictly in the area of selfishness. Human solidarity, on the other side, is the supreme value of the community orientation of a ‘kingdom person’. Individualism – the human person conceived as a monad; a reality in itself, although an understandable reaction to the evil of collectivism, remains captive to the realm of selfishness, which dominates the modernistic mindset. The human being, created ‘in the image of Triune God’, is by design a communitarian being, called to live the solidarity of perichoresis (a Patristic concept describing the coinherence or interpenetration of the actions of the Persons of the Holy Trinity – meaning, basically, that we can never have one divine person, without the other two). The same idea is expressed through the Bantu concept of ubuntu – which states that I can only become a human being through the other human beings; I am human only through and for the others. When we give precedence to security over solidarity, we risk to devolve as persons, to become less human.

Author: DanutM

Anglican theologian. Former Director for Faith and Development Middle East and Eastern Europe Region of World Vision International

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s